I just… the reason you “hated Batman killing” was because you were supposed to. You had the correct reaction to this movie because this movie was written to give Batman a very harsh and hard reality check.
It’s actually one of the most incredible bitter pills the fandom could take to cure the gross toxically hypermasculine culture that Batman has become an unfortunate symbol for.
You were fed that shit with a dose of reality and you rejected it, congratulations. This movie meant to DO something to you, not make you feel warm and fuzzy about American capitalist exceptionalism.
Tag: bvs
BTS photos of domestic Lois and Clark directed by Zack Snyder in Batman v Superan: Dawn of Justice. Unfortunately these scenes never made it into the movie.
“doing good” is not an innate thing that people know how to do. it even takes time to articulate what “doing good” would mean even if our inclination to do so is pure and selfless. does it matter more to protect the people on your street? your country? the world? is it enough to save their life or to make their lives better? do you have enough moral foresight to make those decisions? if you only have so much time, who do you spend it on?
these are the questions zack snyder asks in man of steel and batman v. superman. too often, you will see people say that, because clark is taking the time to really consider his responsibilities, he is not a good person, that he has been hollowed out to someone who disdains the people he most often helps. this is a vestige of our desire to see superheroes hatching out fully formed; all they need is a suit and a plan, and they’re good to go, with a full sense of self-sacrifice. but what clark attempts is a careful consideration of difficult moral decisions that have no clear-cut answer. if your father believes that your life will be in danger if you save him, do you respect his wishes? if the closest thing you have to your race will kill another innocent family if you don’t kill him, what do you do? if a fellow crime fighter is terrorizing a poor neighborhood with impunity, how do you stop him? is the pen actually mightier than the sword? at what point is a line crossed that says you must interfere? what if interfering makes it worse?
mos and bvs are profoundly moral movies. they are altruistic movies. they are selfless movies. superman is humble enough, caring enough, kind enough, to know when he is out of his depth, to know that he cannot simply act and rationalize it after the fact. he can do too much good to rely on his own instincts without interrogating his own motives and making sure he knows what he’s doing and why.
if anyone tries to tell you that clark doesn’t want to help, or that zack snyder’s movies position him as a distant god who’s icked out by the commoners, rather than someone deeply concerned with making sure that harming and helping don’t end up being basically the same, then they have never considered these questions for themselves, and their superman isn’t one i would care to fight for me.
Superman saves Lex from Doomsday.
Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) dir. Zack Snyder
Black and blue. Fight night. The greatest gladiator match in the history of the world. God versus man. Day versus night. Son of Krypton versus Bat of Gotham!
Happy 2nd Anniversary, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
Clark Kent/Superman + perseverance
One of the many, many reasons why I love Snyder/Cavill’s Superman is his determination to keep going, keep fighting, keep protecting. It doesn’t matter what he’s endured or what he’s up against, he’ll keep trying. And you can see the brief moments where he feels overwhelmed, afraid, sad, exhausted, questioning both himself and his actions, and then he renews his resolve and presses on. it’s these very human moments that make the character all the more inspiring and heroic.
DCEU Superman as an introvert
I really dislike how so many people wanted some sort of Reeve!Superman incarnation. For a start, it doesn’t fit with the tone or maturity of the DCEU. Plus, it obviously didn’t work for Superman Returns. It’s sad that audiences feel the need for constant dialogue, quips, and exposition to empathize with Clark/Superman, or like him. To me personally, this signifies a global misunderstanding of introverts and “quiet” people.
Cavill!Clark felt like a REAL person, and as an introverted/shy person, this is so refreshing to see in a movie. ((Same can be said about Mako in Pacific Rim)). Clark didn’t need to be talking non-stop to express thoughts and emotions. We see his little smiles with Lois, his face falling after the Capitol explosion, his terrifying anger at Lex. We SAW his inner turmoil and heard it through other characters (Finch, Martha, Lois, the media) .
Most importantly, Clark spoke when it mattered.
It still baffles me that so many people didn’t understand that Batman’s actions for most of BvS were intended to be negative, both to himself and to the people around him. So many fans talk about how comic Batman is crazy and question if he’s truly any better than the villains he fights, but the moment a movie actually explores that idea in any way and portrays him as mentally ill it’s character assassination.
Exactly. The film couldn’t have been more explicit about the fact that we’re not supposed to see him as being in the right and people still try to paint it as a glorification of his actions and accuse the film of endorsing toxic masculinity which is just olympic-level hypocrisy after all the shit They’ve given Clark for not being a perpetually smiling goon and daring to have complicated emotions.




































